Concerns in the Disability Community about Tim Houston’s Shifting Priorities

(Cartoon from Winnipeg Free Press)

 

By Kendall Worth

In today’s BLOG, I will share my thoughts – and those of people I have spoken with in the disability community as to how that vulnerable community feels about recent developments in Nova Scotia.  

As I discussed in a BLOG earlier this year, there are a number of important issues facing the disability community in Nova Scotia that require immediate action.  First among these was the follow-up to a major human rights case launched years ago by the Disability Rights Coalition. This case addressed the practise of institutionalizing persons with disabilities (PWD). The judgement found that there was systemic discrimination in the system and required the government to identify a remedy that would enable Nova Scotians with disabilities to live in community.

It took several years before the Government responded to this judgement with a “Human Rights Remedy”,  accompanied by action plans and timelines to address the many recommendations of the report. In its first years in office, the Houston Government seemed to be making an honest effort on the de-institutionalization issue.

However, there were many other issues and concerns identified to address other issues related to the inclusion of the disability community in broader society. On these issues there seems to have been little if any action taken. 

This impression was only re-inforced by the most recent sitting of the Provincial Legislature, at which issues of disability and inclusion were not addressed even once. Given that the session lasted only ten days, perhaps people will think this is not surprising. It certainly seems like the Houston Government is determined to spend as little time as possible in the Legislature, where it faces difficult questions from Opposition MLAs.

These concerns have only heightened since the abrupt end of the legislative session. An unexpected policy turnaround by the Houston Government has suddenly shifted the focus of political attention in Nova Scotia from the challenges faced by ordinary citizens to the prospect of both permitting and subsidizing the construction of data centres.  

This issue has inflamed opinion across the province and over the past few weeks has completely absorbed the attention of media, politicians and citizens alike.  As a result, issues like affordability, inclusion, health care, etc have all fallen away - much to our disadvantage as a vulnerable community.

This is not the time or place for me to debate the alleged advantages and disadvantages of data centres. I will say, that from what I have read on the experience of such centres elsewhere, the implications for ordinary citizens do not appear to be positive. Top of the list of concerns is the impact that such centres have on people’s power bills.

Perhaps I will dedicate a future BLOG to exploring the data centre issue. Today, all I want to do is make the case that we cannot allow such issues to distract our government, media and citizens from the HUGE challenges that people in my community – and most notably those who live with disabilities - continue to face, each and every day.    

Data centres will not help us to address these challenges anytime soon. Poverty rates continue to rise in our province, right alongside inflation of groceries and the lack of affordable housing.

It is incumbent for our Provincial government to keep its focus on addressing the needs of ordinary Nova Scotians, and not get distracted by long-term, pie-in-the-sky types of projects like data centres.

A good and simple place to start would be for the Government to extend the rent cap beyond 2027, and to apply that cap to units not individual tenants.  The current rent caps will not apply to disabled Nova Scotians who are leaving institutions and entering the housing market as new tenants. This is wholly unreasonable.

What do you say, Mr Premier?

 

Kendall Worth is an award-winning anti-poverty activist who lives with disabilities and tries to make ends meet on income assistance.


Comments